Overshadowed by Domestic Abuse claims, Alice Through the
Looking Glass is bombing, both nationally and internationally. And at this
juncture, there is very little Johnny Depp will be able to do to win back fans
and draw in an audience for the second installment of this wacky tale. But accusations
aside, how does the film stand on its own? Well, the answer is: It stands on
two very shaky legs. The first leg being Depp, and his tired interpretation of
yet another character that looks and acts like a vast majority of Depp's other
roles. The second leg is new director James Bobin. Replacing Tim Burton, Bobin
is essentially trying to revive a film that many were happy to see die.
Alice Through The Looking Glass comes six years after its
predecessor and follows Alice as she re-enters Underland after leaving three
years before. She's met by a large portion of the film's characters and they
inform her of the Madhatters extreme behaviour and his belief that his family
may still be alive. As with his increase in madness the Hatter's health
deteriorates, so Alice sets out to convince Time himself to rework history and
save the Hatter's family. This obviously leads to a convoluted journey where
Alice tries to right the wrongs in Underland. The tale is more of a clustered
mess than Burtons despite both screenplays having been written by the same
writer, Linda Woolverton. Woolverton's other works include the animated Beauty
and the Beast, Aladdin and Mulan along with live action hits like Maleficent.
Beyond the film's core story lines of Hatter and his family; the warring siblings; and Alice's race against time, there were some interesting plot points scattered throughout the film. One of these was seen in Alice's return to the real world shortly before the films climax. Institutionalized with 'female hysteria', Alice is restrained by a male doctor who says he can cure her of her illness. As most people know, Hysteria was originally associated with women and their wild emotional capacity. Thought for years to be the answer to many women who suffered from legitimate mental disorders like postpartum depression.
Hysteria, as a result, is often used in examples of the changing position of women in society. Once considered so emotionally capable that they must be ill, women are now running companies and families simultaneously. The reason why this interests me is because of the film's overall approach to gender norms and the role of the strong independent woman. It seems entirely fitting that someone of Alice's disposition, in such a time period, would have been considered hysterical. Yet, when young Alice is in Underland she is saving not only men but women too.
The film was as visually stunning as the first, with the usual overuse of CGI in scenes that don't always need digital enhancement, but overall Alice's new adventure fell flat. One of my big pet peeves is when a film uses time travel to, basically, start again - I'm looking at you X-Men. And whilst Underland ended up in sweeter circumstances than the beginning of the film, it felt like the last two hours might as well have not happened. Honestly, what's the point? If your film lacks substance and needs to be carried by few interjected feminist trope in order to pass as noteworthy, then you're not doing it right. I think that Depp's personal issues have ended up being a great excuse for a film that would have flopped regardless.
Beyond the film's core story lines of Hatter and his family; the warring siblings; and Alice's race against time, there were some interesting plot points scattered throughout the film. One of these was seen in Alice's return to the real world shortly before the films climax. Institutionalized with 'female hysteria', Alice is restrained by a male doctor who says he can cure her of her illness. As most people know, Hysteria was originally associated with women and their wild emotional capacity. Thought for years to be the answer to many women who suffered from legitimate mental disorders like postpartum depression.
Hysteria, as a result, is often used in examples of the changing position of women in society. Once considered so emotionally capable that they must be ill, women are now running companies and families simultaneously. The reason why this interests me is because of the film's overall approach to gender norms and the role of the strong independent woman. It seems entirely fitting that someone of Alice's disposition, in such a time period, would have been considered hysterical. Yet, when young Alice is in Underland she is saving not only men but women too.
The film was as visually stunning as the first, with the usual overuse of CGI in scenes that don't always need digital enhancement, but overall Alice's new adventure fell flat. One of my big pet peeves is when a film uses time travel to, basically, start again - I'm looking at you X-Men. And whilst Underland ended up in sweeter circumstances than the beginning of the film, it felt like the last two hours might as well have not happened. Honestly, what's the point? If your film lacks substance and needs to be carried by few interjected feminist trope in order to pass as noteworthy, then you're not doing it right. I think that Depp's personal issues have ended up being a great excuse for a film that would have flopped regardless.
No comments:
Post a Comment